Russia is developing a mechanism to block destructive online content without a court order, raising concerns about potential censorship and restrictions on freedom of expression. The initiative, proposed by the Council of Bloggers, involves creating a special commission under Roskomnadzor to identify and block content deemed harmful. The definition of “destructive content” is still under discussion, leading to fears of arbitrary enforcement.

The State Duma is working on a bill to define and address destructive content, with the first version expected within a few months. Andrey Svintsov, Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Information Policy, acknowledged the lack of a clear definition for “destructive” and emphasized the need for broad discussion involving Roskomnadzor and experts. A round table with lawyers will be held before the bill is submitted, aiming to develop an effective mechanism.

*The initiative aims to protect children from harmful online content, including violence, aggression, and information prohibited in Russia, such as promotion of drug use, gender reassignment, and LGBT content.** State Duma Chairman Vyacheslav Volodin emphasized the importance of shielding children from content that negatively affects their psyche, while assuring that video games would not be completely banned.

Definitions of destructive content vary, ranging from pornography and drug-related content to information promoting non-traditional values and self-harm. Ekaterina Mizulina, head of the Safe Internet League, focuses on content featuring pornography, drug shop advertising, and trash bloggers who humiliate guests or perform dangerous actions. An expert from her organization defines destructive content as any information that can harm a person or push them to harm another.

Legal experts warn that the initiative carries the risk of arbitrary restrictions and infringements on the rights of bona fide users if a legally verified definition and transparent blocking mechanism are not established. Inna Tverezovskaya, head of the freedom of information and reputation practice at the Digital Rights Center, stressed the importance of procedural guarantees, including notification of restrictions and the opportunity to challenge blocks, to maintain a balance between security and freedom of expression.