Muscovites have expressed mixed feelings about Moscow’s renovation program, with many raising concerns about the quality of new buildings, the demolition of historical structures, and increased neighborhood density. While some view the relocation as an opportunity for a fresh start, others highlight significant drawbacks of the high-rise replacements.

One of the primary criticisms revolves around the demolition of buildings with historical or architectural value. Residents lament the loss of constructivist-style buildings, arguing that they are being replaced with densely packed “human beehives.” Critics point to areas like Konkovo, where the renovation program has allegedly exacerbated overcrowding.

The quality of the new housing is another major source of discontent. Residents who have already moved into renovated buildings report issues such as loud pipes, falling facades, and poorly maintained adjacent areas. Empty underground parking lots, attributed to high costs, further contribute to the problem, leading to overcrowded courtyards.

Problems with noise insulation, elevators, and garbage chutes are also prevalent. One resident described the sound insulation as so poor that they could hear their neighbors as if the walls were made of cardboard, expressing a preference for their previous five-story building.

While some appreciate the improved air quality in the high-rise buildings, others criticize the major repair system, where residents pay for maintenance and major repairs. Some feel the quality of the work is often substandard, with concerns that the deterioration of the buildings is accelerated after such repairs.

Finally, some Muscovites feel the urban planning in the Soviet era was better than the current renovation program. They complain about the construction of multi-story towers without adequate infrastructure, such as shops, schools, and clinics.