The presence of a political party that seemingly discourages women from participating based on religious grounds has sparked debate about its place in Dutch democracy. This discussion arises amid concerns about women’s rights and the potential for a “slippery slope” leading to further erosion of these rights.

The Social Reformed Party (SGP) recently saw a majority vote against a motion promoting greater female representation in political and administrative roles. While women are technically permitted to join and run for office within the SGP, they are often discouraged, citing it contradicts the calling of women. This stance is allowed due to the European Court of Human Rights which prohibits the explicit exclusion of women as discriminatory.

The author highlights the tension between the constitutional right to freedom of religion and the principle of equality, enshrined in Article 1 of the Dutch Constitution, which prohibits discrimination based on gender. The question is raised whether a party that appears to systematically exclude women can truly be considered compatible with Dutch democratic values.

The author argues that inaction on this issue could lead to a decline in women’s rights, referencing concerns about femicide, domestic violence, the gender pay gap, and other forms of misogyny. Small actions, such as speaking out against belittling remarks and advocating for equality, are necessary to combat these issues.

The piece concludes by questioning whether the Constitution needs an amendment clarifying that freedom, equality, and solidarity apply only to men if the presence of a party that seemingly excludes women is accepted.