The investigation into former Speaker of the House Khadija Arib reveals a possible settling of scores within the parliamentary circuit, raising concerns about integrity and the need for further investigation.

The case, which initially appeared to be a clear instance of workplace abuse of power, has taken a complex turn, suggesting a deeper conflict within the Dutch Parliament. Initial complaints in September 2022 alleged a ‘reign of terror’ and intimidating behavior by Arib, leading to a parliamentary investigation and her subsequent resignation.

However, recent findings paint a different picture. While the external investigation confirmed that Arib was not always gentle in her approach, the most serious accusations were not substantiated. Many staff members described her as a competent and attentive chair, though some admitted to being emotionally affected by her direct communication style.

The hearings by the National Criminal Investigation Department revealed that at least one senior official involved in ordering the investigation had previously complained anonymously about Arib. Strategic consultations were also held to discuss how to leak the news to win Arib’s ‘communication battle’. There were indications that highly placed individuals knew more than they admitted, and traces had been erased.

The criminal file strongly suggests a settling of scores within the parliamentary circuit. The Public Prosecution Service cannot proceed independently because politicians are involved. The House of Representatives must decide whether to conduct further investigations.

If the House of Representatives wants to maintain its credibility and right to speak on integrity issues, it must make an utmost effort to get to the bottom of this matter.