An investigation into the accusations against former Speaker of the House of Representatives Khadija Arib suggests a possible settling of scores within parliamentary circles, raising questions about the integrity of the process. The case, which initially appeared to fit a pattern of abuse of power, has taken a new turn with the revelation of strategic consultations and potential cover-ups.

The National Criminal Investigation Department’s (Rijksrecherche) hearings have uncovered evidence suggesting that at least one senior official, who initially complained anonymously, was involved in ordering the investigation into Arib. Furthermore, there was a strategic consultation on how to leak the news effectively to win Arib’s “communication battle.” The investigation also found indications that high-ranking individuals knew more than they admitted.

While the external investigation confirmed that Arib could be direct and sometimes raised her voice, it dismissed the most serious accusations. Of the nineteen interviewees, fifteen described Arib as a competent, attentive, and involved chair.

The Public Prosecution Service cannot proceed independently due to the involvement of politicians, and the matter is now back in the hands of the House. The House of Representatives must now decide whether to conduct further investigation into the matter.

The House’s decision is crucial to maintaining its credibility on integrity issues. Failure to thoroughly investigate this matter could undermine its authority to speak out on other integrity issues in the country.