De Hoge Veluwe National Park faces criticism for its lack of cooperation with external researchers and its unique management style, leading to conflicts over data sharing and conservation practices. The park’s director, Seger Emmanuel baron van Voorst tot Voorst, is at the center of the controversies.

The park’s management has been criticized for not sharing data with organizations such as the Mammal Society and Bij12, leading to disputes over wolf management and wildlife monitoring. This lack of transparency has hindered research efforts and fueled concerns about the park’s conservation strategies.

The Hoge Veluwe has a history rooted in its creation as a private hunting ground in the early 20th century. Over the years it has developed a unique identity that sets it apart from other national parks in the Netherlands.

Critics argue that the park’s fencing policy restricts animal movement and disrupts natural ecological processes. The closure of ecoducts, intended to connect habitats, has drawn particular criticism from conservationists.

Despite the criticism, some researchers praise De Hoge Veluwe for its ideal research environment and active support in data collection. The park also highlights its own conservation successes, such as the return of certain species.

De Hoge Veluwe defends its policies by emphasizing its own monitoring efforts and conservation achievements. The park management claims that its approach is necessary to protect biodiversity within its boundaries.

The park generates revenue through entrance fees and other commercial activities. It attracts a large number of visitors annually. The park is formally not a National Park, but uses the name ‘Het Nationale Park De Hoge Veluwe’.