Opposition parties must move beyond moral outrage and instead focus on the ineffectiveness of populist policies to win back voters. Social psychologist Gerben van Kleef suggests this approach is more effective than simply criticizing populist leaders on moral grounds.

The core argument is that voters are not always swayed by moral arguments and may instead be more receptive to rational explanations of how populist policies fail to address their concerns. By focusing on the practical consequences of populist governance, opposition parties can demonstrate that these policies are not delivering the promised solutions.

Several readers responded to the original article, with varying perspectives. Some agreed with van Kleef’s assessment, emphasizing that moral outrage from established parties rings hollow to voters who feel those parties are responsible for existing problems like housing shortages and economic struggles. They argue that these parties have lost credibility and need a new approach.

Others questioned the effectiveness of relying solely on a rational business case. They pointed out that populist leaders are often driven by goals other than solving problems, such as maintaining power and appealing to specific segments of the population. They argue that logic and scientific research alone may not be enough to counter the appeal of symbolic politics and decisive action.

Another reader, a clinical psychologist, added that autocratic leaders often promote a divisive “us vs. them” mentality, which should be challenged directly. This perspective suggests that addressing the underlying psychological factors that contribute to the appeal of populism is also crucial.

One reader suggested that the left may need to re-evaluate its own values and perceived moral superiority, arguing that modern progressive movements sometimes exhibit the same kind of dogmatism and intolerance they criticize in others. This perspective highlights the importance of self-reflection and open dialogue in addressing the challenges posed by populism.

Finally, one reader raised questions about the meaning of “cultural purity,” a concept often invoked by conservative voters. The reader called for a clear definition of this term and a discussion about what contemporary conservatism should look like in the Netherlands.