Political ideologies are making a comeback in Denmark, with discussions on freedom, national identity, and the role of the individual taking center stage. The debate is fueled by international events and a perceived shift away from traditional values.
The discussion intensified with an editorial by Weekendavisen’s editor-in-chief Martin Krasnik, who questioned what Danes are willing to die for, emphasizing freedom as a unifying ideal for democracies. This prompted responses highlighting the importance of freedom as a principle, despite some viewing it as abstract.
Recent events, such as the Arab Spring ignited by Mohamed Bouazizi’s self-immolation in protest against restrictions on his business, illustrate the concrete significance of freedom, particularly freedom of trade. The concept of individual freedom is rooted in the belief that each person is an end in themselves, complemented by the conservative view that cultural communities are vital for maintaining that freedom.
The recent formation of the SVM government was driven by the idea that politicians should analyze their way to an objectively correct, ideology-free solution. This contrasts with the re-emerging emphasis on principles and political ideology, influenced by geopolitical events like the security threat from Russia and uncertainty surrounding US protection.
Figures within Danish politics are weighing in on the evolving ideological landscape. Some express concern over a perceived disconnect between conservatives and other parties, while others reflect on past statements about the end of class struggle and the need for a liberal party to unite diverse communities through shared values. The historical context of freedom of trade in Denmark, introduced in 1857, further underscores its significance to Danish identity and culture.
The debate also involves contrasting perspectives on the nature of freedom, with some arguing that it is “something we give each other,” while others maintain that it is inherent in the individual, predating the state and societal structures. The abolition of freedom, according to this latter view, would undermine the moral foundation of Danish society and national identity.