The author expresses a disconnect between conservative intellectuals and actual conservative parties, arguing that the latter often simply replicate liberal ideas instead of upholding distinct conservative values. This is exemplified by the historical alliance between conservative parties and liberal parties, forming a bulwark against social democratic movements.

While such alliances were initially beneficial, particularly in opposing large state control and advocating for market-based economies, the author suggests that conservatism’s role in these alliances has become merely a temporary means to promote liberal agendas. Liberalism, with its focus on the individual and linear progress, fundamentally differs from conservatism’s emphasis on community, cyclical time, and the wisdom of tradition.

Drawing on Roger Scruton’s definition of conservatism, the author highlights the importance of appreciating inherited institutions, traditions, and social structures. Conservatism values home, local community, culture, and nation, grounding societal development in the experiences of previous generations. It recognizes human imperfection and relies on traditions and culture as sources of wisdom, informing concrete policies that benefit the whole of society.

The shift towards market-fundamentalism in Western societies since the 1980s is seen as a liberal deviation from conservative values. This shift has disproportionately benefited the top 10 percent, eroding the position and recognition of the working class, a trend that contradicts conservative principles of dignity and respect for all members of society.

The author points to the golden period of welfare states as a time of well-functioning societies with high growth benefiting the working class, suggesting that supporting welfare states aligns with conservative values. Danish leaders like Poul Schlüter, who prioritized pragmatism over ideology, are praised for preserving the welfare state and avoiding the negative consequences seen in countries like England and the USA.

The author concludes by emphasizing the need to restore respect for the working class and advocate for policies that ensure their dignified and fair treatment. Think tank leader Oren Cass’s call for an alliance between conservatives and trade unions is supported, as the working class is seen as culturally conservative. The author proposes that a conservative movement that cares for the working class and pursues policies benefiting them would be a potent political force. The author hints at potential support for the Conservative People’s Party if it breaks from liberalism and formulates policies inspired by conservative intellectuals that benefit everyone, possibly in collaboration with the Social Democrats.