Tadej Pogacar’s exceptional performances are sparking debate in the cycling world, with some questioning whether his achievements are within the bounds of natural ability, given the sport’s history of doping. Experts and fellow riders acknowledge Pogacar’s dominance but struggle to fully explain his significant lead over competitors.

Lars Nybo, a professor at the University of Copenhagen, highlights the astonishing level of Pogacar’s performances, comparing them to an Olympic 5,000-meter winner lapping the runner-up. He emphasizes the need to believe in riders while also acknowledging a natural skepticism due to cycling’s past.

Pogacar’s change in training regimen after his defeat in the 2023 Tour de France, including more intensive intervals and strength training, has contributed to his improved performance. However, experts note that advancements in training, equipment, and nutrition apply to all riders, failing to fully explain Pogacar’s and Jonas Vingegaard’s level of superiority.

The presence of controversial figures like Mauro Gianetti, linked to past doping scandals, within Pogacar’s UAE team adds to the skepticism. Despite the absence of recent evidence-based doping suspicions, the history of cheating in cycling casts a shadow over current performances.

Nybo expresses confidence in the anti-doping system but acknowledges past instances of successful cheating, urging continued vigilance. The cycling world remains cautiously optimistic, hoping that skepticism will help maintain a clean sport.