A proposal from several bourgeois parties to map violence among primary school students has drawn criticism from Lotte Rod, a spokesperson for the Radikale party. Rod argues that such a study risks locking children into roles as either perpetrators or victims, potentially worsening the problem of violence in primary schools.
Rod’s concern centers on the potential for stigmatization and the belief that investigating the issue could exacerbate it. The specific connection between knowledge in the area and increased violence remains unclear, raising questions about how to effectively help victims without understanding who is committing the violence.
Critics argue that ignoring the problem will not make it disappear; rather, it will allow it to grow. There is concern that Rod’s position prioritizes avoiding stigmatization of perpetrators over supporting victims of violence, effectively giving a “bully’s veto” that prevents children from being held accountable.
Rod suggests that individual cases of violence often have underlying explanations, such as academic difficulties, overburdened teachers, or family issues. While acknowledging the validity of these explanations, critics caution against using them as excuses that absolve individuals of responsibility for their actions.
The debate raises broader questions about personal responsibility and accountability. While acknowledging that children are not fully mature adults, critics argue that it is reasonable to expect them to refrain from attacking classmates, even in the face of personal challenges.
Critics express concern that disclaiming responsibility has become normalized, hindering children’s development into independent and sensible individuals. By repeatedly suggesting that actions can always be justified by external circumstances, we deprive children of the opportunity to take ownership of their lives.
Investigating and mapping violence is considered a positive step toward addressing the issue. Teaching children that their actions have consequences is seen as crucial for their development and freedom.
Critics disagree with Rod’s assertion that mapping locks children into roles as perpetrators, arguing that they lock themselves into those roles through their actions. However, it is also believed that children can break free from those roles if they take responsibility and acknowledge the consequences.
Holding children accountable is seen as essential for their development and providing them with the freedom to grow. This approach empowers them to take ownership of their actions and their lives.