Mathilde Colbjørn Holst, the vice-chairman of the Liberal Alliance’s youth wing, has been criticized for her deliberate attempts to sabotage kitchen tasks as a feminist statement. Critics argue that such behavior is immature, reactionary, and detrimental to healthy relationships.

The controversy stems from Holst’s admission on “Go’ aften Live” that she intentionally performed poorly in the kitchen, citing examples such as burning food and destroying appliances. Her intention, she stated, was to challenge the societal glorification of women who choose to stay at home and promote gender equality.

Opponents argue that Holst’s actions promote manipulation and dishonesty within relationships, undermining the foundation of trust and open communication necessary for a healthy partnership. They believe that household chores should be divided through open discussion and mutual agreement, allowing both partners to thrive.

Furthermore, critics suggest that Holst’s approach misrepresents the current state of the women’s rights movement, portraying it as a battle against men rather than a pursuit of equal rights and opportunities. They argue that her actions depict men as oppressive figures who are incapable of understanding verbal communication, requiring destructive acts to convey a message.

Instead of viewing relationships as zero-sum games where individual gain is prioritized, critics emphasize the importance of cooperation, love, and mutual care. They suggest that Holst’s focus on career advancement and material wealth reflects a narrow view of life that overlooks the value of personal choices and family well-being.

While Holst problematizes women who choose to work part-time or leave the workforce after childbirth, critics argue that such decisions should be respected as free choices made out of love and care for their families. They believe that true liberation lies in the freedom to choose one’s own path, even if it differs from societal expectations.