European NATO countries have committed to spending five percent of their GDP on defense by 2035, a decision made at the recent NATO summit in The Hague. This move comes amid growing concerns about European security and the need for the continent to bolster its defense capabilities.

The decision to increase defense spending has sparked debate, with some viewing it as a necessary step to ensure European security and others questioning its effectiveness and motives.

One critical perspective comes from Spanish Brigadier General José Enrique de Ayala, who argues that the increased spending is essentially “paying Trump up front” to prevent the U.S. from abandoning its allies. He also suggests that the fear of Russia is irrational and that the focus should be on maintaining solidarity within NATO. Ayala further contends that the American hardware purchased with these funds may become obsolete before it can be used.

The general’s concerns about the rapid pace of technological change in warfare are particularly relevant. Recent drone attacks on Iran and Russian air defense systems highlight the evolving nature of modern conflict, suggesting that new technologies may quickly render traditional military hardware obsolete.

Despite these concerns, there is a clear need for investment in European defense. In Denmark, for example, the defense infrastructure is in a state of disrepair, with barracks suffering from mold and outdated facilities. Warships have defects, and ground-based air defense is lacking. The Danish defense sector has suffered from years of austerity measures that have particularly affected barracks and properties.

A portion of the increased defense spending should be allocated to maintaining and renovating existing defense infrastructure. Years of austerity have left the Danish defense sector in a state of disrepair, with barracks suffering from mold and outdated facilities. It is imperative that these issues are addressed to ensure the readiness and effectiveness of the armed forces.