A pedagogue criticizes the proposed increase in the retirement age to 72, arguing it exacerbates inequality and compromises the quality of care provided to children. The educator emphasizes the physical and emotional toll of the profession, questioning the feasibility of maintaining a high standard of care at an advanced age.

The writer argues that raising the retirement age disproportionately affects those in physically demanding jobs, such as educators, social and healthcare assistants, bricklayers, cleaners, and bus drivers. These individuals, who have contributed significantly to society through their labor, are forced to work longer, while those in less strenuous office jobs with better working conditions can afford to retire earlier.

Furthermore, the pedagogue raises concerns about the impact of older educators on the quality of care for children. They question whether a 70-year-old with physical ailments can provide the necessary energy and attention to children in their care.

The author criticizes the lack of investment in improving working conditions and providing support for educators to navigate the challenges of their profession, such as understaffing, documentation requirements, and stress. They believe that society should prioritize the well-being and dignity of its workers, rather than pushing them to their limits.

The educator advocates for a differentiated retirement age that considers the physical demands of various professions. They assert the right to retire while still in good health and with the ability to enjoy life. The pedagogue concludes by emphasizing that this issue is not only about economics but also about respect, justice, and the kind of society we aspire to be.