Denmark is grappling with the consequences of its foreign worker policies, as a shift in perspective emerges among political parties regarding the balance between economic benefits and cultural impacts. The influx of foreign labor has placed significant strain on local communities, schools, and institutions, prompting a reevaluation of immigration strategies.

The Social Democrats have voiced long-standing concerns about the potential negative impacts of foreign labor on wages, working conditions, and local communities. They emphasize the cultural challenges faced by municipalities accommodating large numbers of foreign workers and their families. Frederik Vad, a member of the Folketing (Parliament) for the Social Democrats, stated that Denmark is a fatherland and not a marketplace.

Recent figures revealing an excessive number of individuals from MENAPT (Middle East, North Africa, Pakistan, and Turkey) countries entering Denmark through foreign student and labor schemes have triggered this shift in the blue bloc’s stance. This contrasts with their previous 25-year view on foreign labor.

Statements from various political figures highlight the evolving debate. Charlotte Munch, a spokesperson for the Danish Democrats, previously stated that the origin of labor was irrelevant as long as it contributed to Danish companies. A joint proposal from the Social Liberals, Conservatives, and Liberal Alliance sought to open Denmark’s borders to all work permit applicants, even before permits were granted.

Former integration minister Rikke Hvilshøj (V) acknowledged that while her policies in the 2000s opened borders to foreign workers in exchange for restrictions on asylum and family reunification, the cultural consequences were overlooked. She noted that the focus was on the economic advantages of integrating immigrants into the labor market rather than relying on transfer incomes.