Denmark is facing increasing concerns about its shift towards a surveillance society due to technological advancements and political decisions. The latest point of contention is an amendment to the Police Intelligence Service (PET) law, which would grant unprecedented data collection and monitoring powers over all Danish citizens, regardless of any suspicion of criminal activity.

This move has sparked debate about the balance between security and individual freedoms. Critics worry that such extensive surveillance could lead to misuse of personal data, erosion of privacy, and a chilling effect on freedom of expression.

One key concern is the potential for data leaks, theft, and misuse. Despite assurances from politicians, there have been numerous instances of sensitive personal data being compromised, including data from Danish authorities.

Furthermore, there are worries about the scope and application of surveillance technologies. While initially presented as tools to combat terrorism and serious crime, these systems often expand to encompass broader uses. This lack of clear boundaries raises concerns about potential mission creep and the erosion of legal safeguards.

The awareness of being monitored can also alter individual behavior. Studies suggest that many Danes already engage in self-censorship in public debate due to fears of surveillance.