A recent debate has erupted in Denmark regarding the interpretation of a survey suggesting that 22% of Danes are homophobic, a claim made by Chief Physician Morten Frisch from Statens Serum Institut. The discussion centers around whether differing views on the morality of same-sex relationships constitute homophobia, or simply reflect diverse personal beliefs.

The controversy stems from a 2017-18 opinion survey that asked participants about the moral acceptability of sexual relations between two men. The 22% who responded “to a small extent or not at all” were labeled homophobic by Frisch. However, critics argue that this label is an oversimplification and fails to recognize the nuances of individual perspectives.

Poul Evald Jensen, a Jehovah’s Witness, and Asbjørn Asmussen from Indre Mission, have both publicly refuted the accusation of homophobia. They emphasize that while they hold traditional views on sexual morality, they treat homosexual individuals with respect and oppose hatred, hostility, discrimination, and degradation.

According to calculations based on Frisch’s survey, approximately 70% of those expressing reservations about same-sex relations still support same-sex marriage, which was legalized in Denmark in 2012. This suggests a broad acceptance of homosexuals’ right to live as they choose.

Martin Ågerup, an economist, argues that a well-functioning liberal democracy requires tolerance for diverse moral viewpoints, as long as individuals treat others with respect and adhere to the law. He cautions against imposing the majority’s morality on minorities and stresses the importance of accommodating different perspectives within the education system.

The survey data also indicates a growing acceptance of homosexuality in Denmark. Among young men aged 15 to 24, only 16% find same-sex relations morally unacceptable, compared to 58% of men aged 75 or older. This generational shift highlights the evolving attitudes towards homosexuality in the country.