The debate surrounding religion and faith has been reignited, prompting a discussion about the relevance of modern atheist critiques of Christianity. According to Ida Auken, a member of parliament for the Social Democrats, current atheist arguments often miss the mark by failing to acknowledge the evolution of Christian beliefs and practices.

Auken argues that contemporary atheists primarily criticize Christianity on two fronts: first, the lack of empirical evidence for God’s existence, and second, the historical wrongdoings of the Church.

She contends that this form of atheism, which demands proof of God and cites historical abuses, is outdated. Auken points out that many modern Christians do not adhere to a literal interpretation of the Bible or a medieval worldview.

Instead, she suggests that faith serves as a supplementary layer of interpretation, offering meaning, comfort, and hope. Auken cites the example of culture writer Ditte Giese, who, while battling cancer, finds solace in prayer and seeks divine intervention for her son.

Auken emphasizes that believers do not claim to definitively know God’s existence but rather believe and hope. They seek connection through prayer and ancient texts, not scientific methods.

She believes that the atheists’ arguments are irrelevant when they engage with Christians as if they have not progressed since the 18th century. Auken concludes that the discussion with today’s atheists is currently uninteresting because they fail to recognize that believers have also experienced an age of enlightenment.