A significant number of researchers in Denmark are refraining from exploring specific topics due to fear of harassment and threats, signaling a critical problem for democratic discourse and the pursuit of knowledge. This self-censorship, highlighted in a survey by the academic trade union Danish Masters, undermines the core purpose of research: to fearlessly investigate challenging and controversial questions.

The consequence of this reluctance is far-reaching, leading to lost opportunities in understanding and addressing societal challenges such as climate change, gender issues, and geopolitics. Without open and fearless research, political decisions may lack crucial insight, and public conversations risk being uninformed by evidence-based knowledge. The situation is exacerbated when sensitive discussions are relegated to less informed platforms because researchers are afraid to share their expertise.

Universities are being called upon to take more concrete action beyond offering supportive words and declarations of formal freedom. They need to establish clear support systems to reassure researchers that they will not be left to fend for themselves in the face of harassment and threats. It’s crucial for institutions to proactively differentiate between legitimate criticism, which is a natural part of scientific discourse, and unacceptable harassment.

Furthermore, universities should actively encourage researchers to engage in public discourse, celebrating those who freely research and speak out. By supporting and protecting researchers, universities can foster a culture of courage and ensure that the pursuit of knowledge remains uninhibited by fear. This commitment to free research is essential for the informed and enlightened society that relies on the expertise of its researchers.