Researchers behind a study on censorship in Danish schools are facing criticism for being “afraid of contact” and “conflict-averse,” according to advisors on the project.

The advisors have expressed concerns that the research may not fully capture the extent of censorship due to a reluctance to engage with potentially sensitive or controversial perspectives. This hesitancy, they argue, could lead to an incomplete and potentially skewed understanding of the issue.

The core of the criticism lies in the advisors’ assessment that the study’s methodology and approach might have been too cautious. This cautiousness, they claim, has resulted in a failure to adequately explore the full spectrum of experiences and viewpoints related to censorship in Danish schools.

The advisors suggest that a more robust and comprehensive investigation would require researchers to actively seek out and engage with diverse voices, even those that may be challenging or uncomfortable. By shying away from potential conflict, the study may have inadvertently limited its scope and impact.