The Danish immigration debate has undergone a significant transformation, marked by a growing consensus on stricter immigration policies among major political parties. This shift is particularly evident on the left wing, where parties like the Social Liberal Party (Radikale Venstre) have adopted a less confrontational approach.

Zenia Stampe, the Social Liberal Party’s immigration spokesperson, acknowledged this change in a recent podcast, citing strategic considerations. She explained that the party’s less combative stance is partly driven by a desire to be a viable government partner and influence policy.

Stampe also expressed frustration with the Social Democrats’ perceived attempts to bait the Social Liberals into debates to appear stricter on immigration. She described a long-standing “playbook” where the Social Democrats would make controversial statements, prompting outrage from the Social Liberals. The party has grown weary of this dynamic and seeks to avoid being “useful idiots” in the Social Democrats’ branding efforts.

The Socialist People’s Party (SF) declined to comment on the perceived shift on the left wing. Rosa Lund from the Red-Green Alliance (Enhedslisten), while no longer the immigration spokesperson, expressed disagreement with the idea of the left wing reducing its focus on immigration policy. She argued that it is crucial to actively promote their immigration policy positions to the public.

The relationship between the Social Democrats and the Social Liberals has been historically strained, particularly over immigration policy. The Social Liberals played a role in the early downfall of the Social Democratic minority government in 2019, leading to lingering tensions. The Social Liberal Party aims to mend these rifts by acknowledging the Social Democrats’ evolution on immigration.

Frederik Vad, the Social Democrats’ immigration spokesperson, welcomed the potential acceptance of stricter immigration policies by parties on the left. While acknowledging the shift, he noted the Social Liberals’ tendency to criticize tightening measures as symbolic politics. He denied intentionally provoking the Social Liberals with policy proposals, stating his focus is on addressing societal challenges.